AnsweredAssumed Answered

Nasty slow ping times.... *within* the Shaw network...

Question asked by bleargh on Dec 11, 2013
Latest reply on Dec 11, 2013 by bleargh

I'd called tech support earlier, but the gentleman that I spoke with wasn't able to provide any information or was willing to create a ticket for this.


WITHIN the Shaw network, I've got 200ms ping times.


The Shaw rep I spoke with tells me that that's an acceptable ping time and that there's nothing that can be done.  I have a static IP, and those get subject to different routing rules in Alberta, and as a result my ping times are higher than if I had I dynamic IP.




What brought this to my attention this morning was trying to access one of our servers in Amsterdam, and it was *really* slow.  Negligible packet loss, but high latency.


Pulled up "mtr" and "traceroute" to see what was going on, and was surprised to see that I'm 190-200ms before I even leave the Shaw network.  200ms from Vancouver Island, to Edmonton.  What the hell?


traceroute to (, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

1  * * *

2 (  14.746 ms  14.849 ms  14.873 ms

3 (  20.543 ms  20.582 ms  20.705 ms

4 (  27.814 ms  27.904 ms  27.931 ms

5 (  36.022 ms  36.053 ms  36.145 ms

6 (  51.556 ms 44.601 ms 44.805 ms

7 (  79.697 ms  77.769 ms  77.816 ms

8 (  113.830 ms 105.222 ms  111.696 ms

9 (  200.769 ms  192.641 ms  192.693 ms

10 (  191.402 ms  190.494 ms  190.822 ms

11 (  192.448 ms  191.058 ms  203.605 ms

12  * * *

13  * * *

... (we have pings firewalled out on the server)


I've done multiple traceroutes this morning, and this one showed the least amount of bouncing around inside of the Shaw network.  Other traceroutes showed paths of "Nanaimo -> Vancouver -> Calgary -> Edmonton -> New York -> Calgary -> Edmonton -> Amsterdam".


One thing I have been able to determine is that the paths that get the *worst* routing within Shaw, are the ones that connect to "" over in Amsterdam.  When I connect to other servers we have at the same facility and we get routed through "", I'm at ~30ms within the Shaw network, and rarely over 150ms to the final destination.


So... someone from Shaw please explain to me... how is "200ms *within* the Shaw network" considered reasonable?


When I've spoken to techs at Shaw Business Support in the past they'd advised me to contact them if I ever saw it take more than 100ms to leave the Shaw network, and here I have someone today on the phone telling me that 200ms is acceptable and that I should just lump it.